Who was right?
In the end, we have no idea whose story we need to trust and believe. They both have some good points, but the public seems to be leaning toward Madelyne’s story. Whether it was the truth or not, it would be crazy for someone to do what she did without a good reason.
For someone to just enter your art gallery during a show and smash an expensive piece of work for nothing would make no sense. So the public just assumed that she needed to have a reason and it couldn’t just be to become famous. Britto was a big-time artist but he wasn’t on that level of fame.